MOVIE REVIEWS |
		
		
		INTERVIEWS |
		
		
		YOUTUBE |  
 
		
		
		NEWS 
		|   
		EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
		
		
		AUDIO |
		
		
		ESSAYS |
		
		
		ARCHIVES |  
		
		CONTACT 
		|
 PHOTOS | 
		 
		 
		
		COMING SOON|
		
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME
 
                                                            
Thursday, July 26, 2012
MOVIE REVIEW
Ruby Sparks
Words Become Her At A Writer's Beck And Type

Zoe Kazan in the title role of "Ruby Sparks", the romantic comedy-drama she 
also wrote.  The film is directed by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris.  
Fox Searchlight Pictures
 
  
by 
 
Omar P.L. Moore/PopcornReel.com
        
 
FOLLOW                                           
Thursday, July 26, 
2012
Writing isn't easy to convey 
cinematically.  Writing is often dry and inelastic on the big screen.  
In the recent past one film about writing leaps to my mind as an entertaining 
experience: Spike Jonze's "Adaptation." -- a great film on writing that makes 
writing a living, breathing thing.  Written by Charlie Kauffman and Donald 
Kauffman and based on Susan Orlean's best-seller The Orchid Thief, 
"Adaptation." was funny, playful and smart.  
Jonathan Dayton 
and Valerie Faris' new romantic comedy-drama "Ruby Sparks", which 
opened yesterday across the U.S. and Canada, parlays some Kauffman feel, but on 
its own terms works for about 40 minutes as an interesting though cliché-ridden 
romantic comedy-drama about lonely, celebrated writer Calvin (Paul Dano), whose 
latest literary work-in-progress, one Ruby Sparks ("Sparks" writer Zoe Kazan) 
becomes vividly real to its creator.  Calvin's brother Harry (Chris 
Messina, 
"Julie And Julia") doesn't believe Calvin's creation is real.  
Calvin's psychiatrist (Elliott Gould, in a funny, understated performance) 
encourages his patient to explore.
In Los Angeles Calvin, a John Lennon-lookalike, types in a shadowy room on a 
vintage typewriter.  His imagination is illuminated by a sunny, dreamy 
vision.  It mesmerizes him, supplying words for his blank page.  Ruby 
Sparks is Calvin's muse.  He's led to her.  She comes to him.  
It's love.  It's real.  They are in love.  And then the movie 
seems to end.  The juice and exhilaration of the initial beauty, poetry and 
absorption evaporate into needless comedic caricature, with Calvin's mother 
(Annette Bening) and stepfather (Antonio Banderas), the kind of shtick more 
appropriate in the infinitely better Dayton-Faris debut effort
"Little Miss 
Sunshine".  The film spends the rest of its time feverishly 
distracting itself.
Mr. Dano (also in "Little Miss Sunshine") works hard to bring Calvin's heartbeat 
to functional, though I never felt Calvin had a soul.  Calvin is his 
typewriter, a static, fearful figure mired in existential angst.  Mr. 
Dano's character has a neurotic Woody Allen in him, only without the familiar 
Allenesque banter.  Ms. Kazan keeps things simple in her performance, and 
this vigorous and alternately dour film dances around her.  She's the one 
bit of genuine energy and life the film has.
"Ruby Sparks", which offers occasional laughs, as a film looks and feels 
distinctly uncomfortable with itself.  Halfway through are flashes of 
graphic horror and I wondered why.  Near the end the film attempts a 
different kind of horror, making crescendo and melodrama out of scarcely 
anything at all.  Ms. Kazan, an actress in such films as
"Revolutionary 
Road", writes a script with one or two good ideas but I don't think 
they are translated well via the direction of husband and wife team Dayton and 
Faris.  The direction is the biggest problem with "Ruby Sparks", 
as is its uneven tone, and its angelic title character is pile-driven into the 
ground in a series of foolish, cringe-worthy climaxes that punish the audience 
for no appreciable good reason.  The directors mean well but their 
predictable film, overlong and devoid of any subtlety and ingenuity, does not.
The anti-social, self-loathing Calvin is a Luddite and misogynist, whom, like 
the character Jay of the current film 
"Trishna" wants to control the one woman in his 
life and keep her under lock and key.  Calvin never truly enjoys Ruby, only 
the idea of her and the male chauvinist desire to operate Ruby like a wind-up 
toy or robot.  I don't think the filmmakers are sexist in the portrayals 
but Ms. Kazan's story fuels such a response, since Ruby lacks her own voice and 
independence, aside from a few minutes in the film's second half.  Ruby is 
the damaging stereotype of single, needy, obsessive woman via the projection of 
male fantasy: talk French, talk Spanish.  Clean.  Strip.  Sing.  
Fall.  Jump.  Ooh la la!  None of these moments is funny, and 
Dayton & Faris don't make them out to be.  Yet the film's climaxes are also 
not nightmarish in the way they should be, coming off as exploitive regardless 
of the filmmakers' intentions.  
One could say "Ruby Sparks", a film about possession and perception, occurs 
purely in Calvin's mind.  Some of it does, but the origin of anguish in 
Calvin isn't appreciably drawn to generate much substance or audience concern 
for his plight.  Yes, Calvin is a agonized sheltered writer who questions 
himself, but don't we all question ourselves sometimes?  There's little 
background, underpinning or shape to Calvin, so he becomes as much a caricature 
and wicked fantasy as Ruby, and for that matter, everyone else in the film does. 
Ruby may literally leap off Calvin's page but the film itself does not.  
You feel the directors trying to shake things up and inject life into "Ruby 
Sparks" but its final choking and cloying minutes feel like smog and exhaust 
fumes in the City Of Angels.  There's a lack of discipline in the film's 
conclusion.  "Ruby Sparks" could have ended earlier than it does and at 
least left something to the imagination.
Had the directors stayed focus on the gloomy, edgy story of Calvin and his 
journey into darkness without resorting to a sitcom-y type-filled middle, "Ruby 
Sparks" wouldn't have had to overcompensate with its forced, orchestrated and 
overstacked ending.  The film would have been an even, precise effort.  
The following is admittedly an unfair comparison to make: the works of William 
S. Burroughs ("Naked Lunch") and Hunter S. Thompson ("Fear And Loathing In Las 
Vegas") are one thing on the big screen.  The pretentious "Ruby Sparks", a 
near-disaster, is unfortunately quite another.
Also with: Steve Coogan, Toni Trucks, Aasif Mandvi, Deborah Ann Woll.
"Ruby Sparks" is rated 
R by the Motion Picture Association Of America for
language including some sexual references, and 
for some drug use.  The film's running time is one hour and 44 minutes.  
COPYRIGHT 2012.  POPCORNREEL.COM.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.                
 
 
FOLLOW
MOVIE REVIEWS |
		
		
		INTERVIEWS |
		
		
		YOUTUBE |  
 
		
		
		NEWS 
		|   
		EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
		
		
		AUDIO |
		
		
		ESSAYS |
		
		
		ARCHIVES |  
		
		CONTACT 
		| PHOTOS | 
		 
		 
		
		COMING SOON|
		
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME