MOVIE REVIEWS |
INTERVIEWS |
YOUTUBE |
NEWS
|
EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
AUDIO |
ESSAYS |
ARCHIVES |
CONTACT
|
PHOTOS |
COMING SOON|
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME
Friday, December 2, 2011
MOVIE REVIEW
Answers To Nothing
Apropos Of Nothing, Answers Blowing In The Wind
Elizabeth Mitchell as Kate and Dane Cook as Ryan in Matthew Leutwyler's drama
"Answers To Nothing".
David Jones/Roadside Attraction
by
Omar P.L. Moore/PopcornReel.com
FOLLOW
Friday,
December 2, 2011
Matthew Leutwyler's drama "Answers To Nothing", opening today in select cities
including San Francisco, is a film that blows in the wind, a light,
inconsequential and maddening experience, one which made me angrier than I
expected to be.
Set in Los Angeles, "Answers" contains at least four stories: one about a
missing girl and possible suspects; another about a marriage affected by
adultery; one about a police officer who's daughter's death reverberates; one
about a black woman who says she hates black people, and another about a sister
whose selfishness alters the life of her brother. Stitched together like
Altman slices, Mr. Leutwyler's film evokes a Los Angeles full of quirky, sad
people who have become that way through life's trials and tribulations.
(Ethan Hawke once said in "Training Day" that L.A. is full of "smiles and
cries", and this film shows much of the latter.)
Dane Cook is Ryan, a man in an adulterous marriage. He and his wife Kate
(Elizabeth Mitchell) try for kids but there's strain in the relationship --
Ryan's infidelity. In addition, Ryan has to handle his mother's delusional
behavior (Barbara Hershey) as he comes to grips with the disappearance of his
dad from the household after many years. Allegra (Kali Hawk) goes into a
meeting with fellow television writers at her near all-white workplace and talks
about how much she hates black people. Their reaction is priceless (as was
mine.)
I won't go through the other stories involved, though some intersect, and many
don't seem to. Mr. Leutwyler, originally from San Francisco, assembles a
talented cast but a group of characters I just didn't care about. There's
not one who inspires any kind of passion or reason to invest in. Not one
-- even the supposedly sympathetic characters -- and there's at least one of
those here. The script by Mr. Leutwyler and Gillian Vigman needed more
development and punch -- several rewrites would have done the trick.
Characters are undone or betrayed by last minute tricks and contrivances that
irritate rather than inform their circumstances or growth. Some characters
"grow", while others lack appreciable arc -- or maybe that is their
arc: that they remain stunted.
If anything, "Answers To Nothing" is guilty of trying too hard. It is
overwrought and full of the clichés that make you wish the film were a comedy,
and Mr. Leutwyler's film would have functioned better that way. Comedy is
admittedly harder to do in general, and particularly on film. It requires
deeper, more nuanced treatment and a level of acting that exposes raw edges or
glimpses of the seriousness that arise from comedy. Drama requires playing
situations for serious all the time, and to keep that undercurrent on display,
percolating until the tension dam explodes. As a result with drama there's
less wiggle room available, and any comedy that arises in moments that aren't
supposed to be funny subverts dramatic intent completely.
Mr. Cook, a comedian who has made a foray into several films over the years,
looks slightly out of his element here as Ryan, the lead character. Mr.
Cook plays Ryan as a deadpan guy, miserable and without feeling. There's
no range or room for Mr. Cook's character to evolve, so his Ryan comes off as
stiff and far too serious in a serious film, which in a sense is its own kind of
comedy, but the kind that brings derisive laughter.
"Answers To Nothing" shows us a group of characters but doesn't know what to do
with them. These self-centered, self-pitying types float in and out of
stories that have been done better many times before, and, if nothing else, with
more spirit or daring ("Magnolia", "Shorts Cuts", and even the Oscar-winning
"Crash", a film I wasn't fond of.) However well intended Mr. Leutwyler and
his cast are, "Answers To Nothing" lacks confidence in its sense of story and
convictions. The film's most dramatic moments often feel like remnants of
a comedy that had been left on the cutting room floor of a comedy film. In
short "Answers To Nothing" is restless, unfocused and putrid, one of the poorest
films I've seen in 2011.
After sitting through more than two hours of "Answers To Nothing", I found
myself getting increasingly angry at the pointlessness of what I was watching.
When several characters do about-faces I didn't believe in their abrupt change,
and the acting never rises to the level of cultivating such credibility.
"Answers To Nothing", which tries to provoke for provocation's sake, made me
say, "what the hell was that I just watched?" Somewhere in here there was
potential for a decent film, but between the idea and its final execution on the
big screen, much was lost in translation.
With: Elizabeth Mitchell, Julie Benz, Miranda Bailey, Mark Kelly.
"Answers To Nothing" is rated R by the Motion Picture Association
Of America for some strong sexual content, nudity, violence and language.
The film's running time is two hours and three minutes.
COPYRIGHT 2011. POPCORNREEL.COM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
FOLLOW
MOVIE REVIEWS |
INTERVIEWS |
YOUTUBE |
NEWS
|
EDITORIALS | EVENTS |
AUDIO |
ESSAYS |
ARCHIVES |
CONTACT
| PHOTOS |
COMING SOON|
EXAMINER.COM FILM ARTICLES
||HOME